Christian Petersen - Getty Images
5 months ago: GLENDALE, AZ - JANUARY 02: Andrew Luck #12 and David DeCastro #52 of the Stanford Cardinal celebrate after Luck threw a 16-yard touchdown pass to Zach Ertz #86 in the third quarter against the Oklahoma State Cowboys during the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl on January 2, 2012 at University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Going into the draft, everybody has their favorite prospects. Some people are high on talent, some are high on speed, and others are high on previous success--whatever the criteria, there's one name you desperately hope to hear the Bengals call on April 26th. The NFL Scouting Combine may not heavily influence that common fan's evaluation of prospects, but it does bear slightly more significance to the 32 NFL front offices. Earlier today, Cincy Jungle's own Mike Fightmaster discussed the importance of the NFL Combine and the impact it has on certain players' draft stock. Whether or not the Combine is that important is debatable, but pre-combine player rankings carry significance regardless.
Mike Mayock of NFL Network recently posted his top five players at each position heading into the Combine. For the positions most important to the Bengals--guard, cornerback, and running back--Mayock provides no shock at the No. 1 spots, but has quite a few interesting choices at No. 2 through No. 5. The rankings are as follows:

Cornerback
1. Morris Claiborne, LSU
2. Dre Kirkpatrick, Alabama
3. Janoris Jenkins, North Alabama
4. Trumaine Johnson, Montana
5. Leonard Johnson, Iowa State
This list is different from almost all other pre-combine cornerback rankings. The usual suspects of Claiborne, Kirkpatrick and Jenkins are no surprise as the top three prospects, but instead of the frequently heard names of Stephon Gilmore and Alonzo Dennard at No. 4 and No. 5, Mayock lists Trumaine Johnson and Leonard Johnson.
In comparison, Sports Illustrated's Tony Pauline listed Trumaine Johnson as the 9th best cornerback and Leonard Johnson as the 12th. Mayock does not elaborate on his selections, but it would be interesting to see why he values Johnson and Johnson more than Gilmore and Dennard. Perhaps he sees Gilmore and Dennard as busts--as most people feel about Dennard lately--and Johnson and Johnson as middle round sleepers, so he lists them according to that sentiment. Whatever the case, the addition of Trumaine Johnson and Leonard Johnson to the top five cornerbacks in the upcoming draft is sure to draw some attention and criticism.
Interior Offensive Lineman
1. David DeCastro, Stanford
2. Peter Konz, Wisconsin
3. Kevin Zeitler, Wisconsin
4. Amini Silatolu, Midwestern State
5. Kelechi Osemele, Iowa StateOut: Glenn (switched groups from interior offensive lineman to tackle)
The first thing to notice is the guard de-classification of Georgia's Cordy Glenn. Glenn played both guard and tackle in college and has been listed as a guard prospect for most of this offseason, so it's fair to still classify him in that position. Mayock lists Glenn as the fourth best tackle prospect, behind certain first round selections Matt Kaliil, Reilly Reiff, and Mike Adams.
Of this list, DeCastro is the best guard talent by far (Konz is a center) and many Bengal fans will be crossing their fingers that he isn't off the board by picks No. 17 and 21. Zeitler, Silatolu and Osemele are projected by most as middle round picks, which may work out well if CIncinnati decides to address other positions with their first few picks.
Running Back
1. Trent Richardson, Alabama
2. David Wilson, Virginia Tech
3. Lamar Miller, Miami (Fla.)
4. Doug Martin, Boise State
5. LaMichael James, Oregon
When it comes to the draft, running back the most highly debated position among fans. Should Cincy trade up to grab Richardson? Should a first rounder be used on running back at all? What about free agency?
Each of the top four on this list have been discussed as possible draft choices of the Bengals. All except LaMichael James. Draft scouts do not hold James in high regard despite his collegiate success, and usually predict him as a middle round selection. His inclusion in the top five means that another prospect was snubbed off the list--in this case, University of Cincinnati's Isaiah Pead. Pead's stock has been steadily rising since the end of the season--TFY Draft Insider now lists him as a possible second round pick--and has all the makings of a steal if he can be had with a middle round selection.
It's been said a thousand times, but this upcoming draft is sure going to be interesting.
For more from Cincy Jungle, make sure to follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.
0 recs | 37 comments
I still think James warrants consideration.
As small as he is, LaMichael runs really hard. He’s as relentless of a runner as I’ve ever seen. He’s not gonna run people over because he doesn’t have that kind of size, but he runs through arm tackles and through contact extremely well. He’d be a great pick if they signed someone like Bush before the draft.
RHSNEYES - February 15, 2012
Agreed
He runs very hard for his size—a little like Jaquizz Rodgers. He’s insanely fast and he can line up as a wideout. If the Bengals get a bigger back in free agency or the draft, I wouldn’t mind them picking up James in the middle rounds. He’s a gamebreaker.
Anthony Cosenza - February 15, 2012
Jacquizz Rodgers and LaMichael James are quite different types of RBs.
Rodgers is more of a shifty, squat, between the tackles back like MJD, and is a good blocker with a knowledge of NFL-type pass protection (he worked as Atlanta’s 3rd down back much of the year, and caught 78 passes one NCAA season).
James is more of a poor man’s Reggie Bush, except he’s smaller, thinner, and has no experience as a pass blocker or typical "outlet" type receiver. He should work well as a return specialist, and MAYBE can learn enough about an NFL passing game to become a 3rd down back. I don’t think he’s worth more than a 4th round pick. I wouldn’t be comfortable with him for more than 5-6 carries a game. If we were attempting to replace Bernard Scott, I’d say great pick, but we’re trying to upgrade Cedric Benson.
I don’t think James has the right skill set for the west coast offense Gruden wants to run.
PeteRoseJr - February 15, 2012
If we are going to get a small back to be a limited back
we might as well get chris rainey from florida, he is the fastest and has great hands. And we will be able to pick him up in the very late rounds
hewesdilg - February 16, 2012
Jamesis not an every down back though. He is another Darren sproles but a downgrade from him. I can see him maybe in third fourth round as a change of pace but that is it!
Bengalsredsvictim - February 16, 2012 via mobile
James is a change of pace back, NOT a 3rd down back like Sproles
Look at how LeGarrette Blount out of that oregon offense has had trouble with being anything other than a 1st & 2nd down back.
James is going to have that same type of learning curve in a sophisticated NFL passing game.
Dude has never had to stay in the backfield and read the defense to determine if he should block a blitzer or release as an outlet.
It’s possible he can learn it, but it won’t be in the first half of 2012.
There will be other, better options.
PeteRoseJr - February 16, 2012
I'm glad Mayock wrote his top five out instead of telling people what they were
Could get a little messy.
whodeycommish14 - February 15, 2012 via mobile
The RB snub is definitely Polk before Pead.
Cry - February 15, 2012
Agreed.
RHSNEYES - February 15, 2012
except..
Polk isn’t on the list either…?
indesignkat - February 15, 2012
The article mentions Pead is the snub, I think it's Polk.
I think most draft boards have Polk above Pead.
Cry - February 15, 2012
Pead and James are the same build and speed
James has at least put up better numbers in college.
keithster - February 15, 2012
ah, I get ya
And I agree. No one outside of Cincinnati has Pead as a top 5 RB.
indesignkat - February 16, 2012
I think he means Polk is the guy snubbed by James' inclusion
PeteRoseJr - February 15, 2012
Hey guys! I always read CIncy Jungle but Im new to sign up. Im glad I finally did! I have a question…am I the only one who thinks Chris Polk should or could be in the top 5 rb prospects this year? He seems to be over looked and I think he could be a steal in the 2nd rd of the draft… Thoughts?
Fevaman513 - February 15, 2012
i wasn't that high on him because he reminds me a lot of cedric benson lol
i think for the bengals at least, they will be looking for an upgrade athletically at the RB position and i don’t think polk is that athletic compared to other players in this years draft.
But yea, its not out of the question that he is in the top 5 RB prospects. It all depends what you look for in a back.
Here is my top 5.
1. Richardson
2. Pead
3. Martin
4. James
5. Miller
AMAS85 - February 15, 2012
True...lol
He does seem to be comparable to Benson in some ways…I just think as far as the afc north goes I would rather have a back that can deliver a blow at the end of a run. I think he has better vision than Benson, more of a quick step through the hole and I would take his size over Pead or even Miller. But that all depends on what moves are made during the FA’s. i think they have Polk listed at 5’11" 222lbs….he also has a mean stiff arm! lol
Fevaman513 - February 15, 2012
yea I maybe over looking Polk is some ways, at times he even reminds of M Turner with the way he runs with power
but to add what you said about the AFCN, it is common belief that you need that bruiser in our division. But at the same time, why can’t we be that team the differs from the other teams to gain an advantage.
For example. I really like TR and would be estatic if we got him, but Pead is the guy I would love to have. The way Pead moves is poetry in motion. And will be a steal for the team that picks him up. Every step Pead makes has a purpose and his almost guarenteed to make the first guy miss. I think if you throw pead in our division, he would do wonders. He would be going against bigger guys with way slower lateral movement. He will make so many steelers and ravens eat dirt.It would make the steelers and baltimore adjust they way draft to help contain this guy. There is something special about him. I will easily go out on the limb for him.
And its not because he from UC, I value talent.
p.s. wouldn’t mind getting TR and Pead. Our offense would be set for years to come.
AMAS85 - February 15, 2012
I like Pead as well...
My only hang up with him is his size..He is very elusive and definetiley could be a game changer. Im just worried about his durability! I have a love/hate feeling with that scenario…Its seems evident that Benson wont be back (crosses fingers) and although I would love to have a home run threat like Pead I would always be worried about the combination of having small backs with him and Scott facing some of the stoutest defenses in the NFL…I just feel like it could work and beautiful or it could be a disaster if one gets hurt…also…I havent researched it but how well does Pead pick up blocks in the back field? That could make or break my opinion…
Fevaman513 - February 16, 2012
he is very suspect at blocking from what i have seen
but at the same token, he didn’t have many opportunities to block at UC. I would say he would stay back to block maybe 3 or 4 times a game because if he wasn’t getting the ball out of the back field, he was running routes out of the back field. so it was either he wasn’t good at all with blocking or he was just such a big part of the UC offense they could afford to take him out of the play to block.
AMAS85 - February 16, 2012
Well...
It would be interesting to see if that is in fact a weak point in his game…With this being only Dalton’s 2nd yr at the helm I would feel more comfortable with a back that can block…but he is worth considering because of the other attributes he brings to the table.
Fevaman513 - February 16, 2012
yea that would be my only concern too, but he would have to be absolutely terrible at blocking tho
I don’t think Benson was that great either.
AMAS85 - February 16, 2012
lol...
Last season there wasnt much Benson did that I thought was done particularly well besides looking like he lost his puppy when Scott was getting carries and he was on the sideline…lol
Fevaman513 - February 16, 2012
He's never been a great NFL RB
His biggest yr was the yr Kelly went down and we put up an unbalanced line for him to run behind. We ended up winning the division that way though. Some teams just get unconventional with their offensive schemes like NE with the 2 TE’s. Not saying it’s ever been done but you kust don’t see it much in todays game. I wouldn’t mind seeing us go back to the heavy sets more with Polk in the backfield.
Bigcatdaddy - February 16, 2012 via Android app
Right..
He was serviceable for a couple of years but I really think with the way our offensive scheme is headed he doesnt fit….He doesnt have the vision or burst to be effective anymore…his blocking is sub par and attitude is borderline cancerous! I cant count how many passes he dropped last season. Even though some of it could be blamed on the o-line he just was plain out flat most of the year..I used to love the way he finished his runs early on when he became a Bengal but you can hardly have a great finish to a 2 yd run ( if that)…lol..I cant wait to see how creative Gruden is with a whole off season with this offense and a year under his belt! In a way benson limited what we could do… I like Polk or Martin in the 2nd if T Rich doesnt fall!!
Fevaman513 - February 16, 2012
Love the Rankings +2
Touhue Cha - February 16, 2012
Welcome to the Jungle
I absolutely think Polk should be considered in the top 5. He’s in mine but who I’m I anyway lol. He could be an absolute steal in the 2nd with alot of other RB’s getting the post,season Love he’s flying under the radar (medias anyway). The guy is big, fast, and has great hands. Everything we need in a RB. Although I like TR (obvious) and then Miller or Martin then Polk. There are a few other great RB’s out there but those are just who I like in our scheme. If we land Polk with the others I listed off the board I wouldn’t be upset at the pick at all.
Bigcatdaddy - February 15, 2012 via Android app
Agreed!
Fevaman513 - February 15, 2012
P.S. Thanks for the welcome!!
Fevaman513 - February 16, 2012
"He’s in mine but who I’m I anyway lol"
lol don’t get caught up in that “expert” analyst stuff. You have a right to your opinion. Granted people take more time into looking into player evaluations and such, but we all have valid points in why we may like a certain player over another one. We have 32 teams in the NFL and no two teams have the same play book. So certain players are higher some boards and lower on other boards.
AMAS85 - February 16, 2012
Totally..
As the cliche goes, it only takes one team.
Cry - February 16, 2012
i.e. Denver taking Tebow in the first lol
AMAS85 - February 16, 2012
If he's right about Glenn
that makes him more attractive as a draft pick at 21. A guard who can step in at tackle frees the team from worry over Andre Smith plus plugs a big hole, literally.
I agree with his RB selections only to the extent TR is the only 1st round guy there. CB list is interesting too and makes me wonder if outside of the first two, the remainder are nickle guys this season? Who wants a nickle guy from the first round?
BENGALS69 - February 16, 2012
That's what I like about Glenn
If we don’t resign Collins then we really don’t have a backup for Whit. Getting Glenn help in a few spots. He can play LT, both G spots and I’m sure he could probably step in at RT. Resign Williams, start Glenn at right G and if we have a unforseen injury plug Glenn in that spot and move Williams back into his spot. Anyway him being able to play multiple spots is going to have a lot of teams looking at him.
Bigcatdaddy - February 16, 2012 via Android app
Remember daddy, there is alot of cap room for a couple of key FAs
I see a definite possibility that the Oline and Dbackfield will see some new faces. Yea we may over pay a couple for a year or two but we have plenty of room to get rid of some deadwood and add not that much more to replace them.I say look to the draft for longer term solutions and fix 2-3 immediate needs in FA. It isn’t like 10 years ago when nobody wanted to come here. We may be their 2nd or 3rd choice but I am sure several see the possibilities here.
Reggie Wayne (cough cough)
JUNGLEJOHN - February 16, 2012
Hope so
We definitely need to be active in FA even if that’s just resigning our own. On the offensive side we really don’t have any FA worth resigning, well maybe Williams but they could definitely make him expendable if they sign some good linemen but he could still be a great insurance policy. If we can get a start in FA by bringing in some DB’s and O linemen then it would really help them come draft time. It all comes down to do they want to get better or just resign the same old, same old.
Bigcatdaddy - February 16, 2012 via Android app
I would resign Williams if they don't bring in a pretty experienced FA at G
I know it is kind of cliche but he is good in the locker room and he can help a top draft pick like DeCastro (not likely he will fall) to learn the finer points of playing G in the NFL. I love our youth but we need an older pro in every position group to help bring the younger guys around.
That is the reason I keep touting Reggie Wayne. He is a comsumate pro and can help our young WR taent get better faster as well as perform as a very good #2 WR right now. That is two very strong plusses.
I do agree that there are no ffensive FAs I worry about resigning. Good riddance to bad rubbish. It is time we went out and got what we need. We have brought in some great young talent and if we don’t support them by winning in the next couple of years they will be looking for a winner in a few years. Green is seemingly a goog guy but if we continue to be around a .500 team he is going to look for a winning team to join when his contract is up and they will be eager to sign him. There are a few others on this team who will have the same opprotunity and motivation. We need to get smart.
JUNGLEJOHN - February 17, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Cincy Jungle to post a comment.